When I’m in charge, the punishment for the righteous, childless tech-judging masses will be 24 hours locked in a room with a toddler. We’ll see how long it takes you to reach for your phone, or at least pass it to the kid so you are finally free to curl up in a ball in the corner and pray for nap time. Until then, let’s give smartphone touting parents a break.
I get where you’re coming from, and I wouldn’t dare rant against “hands free,” engaged parenting. Here are the facts - numerous studies have shown that children who watch less than 2 or 3 hours of TV a day fare better academically than those who watch more. Media use, including the myriad of programming with ambitious names like “Baby Genius” or “Baby Einstein,” has shown to be in no way linked to positive learning outcomes. In fact, baby peers who watched no TV tested better on the tests scientists make up to measure infant intelligence, like how long your baby looks at a new picture, etc. In Western culture, infants and young children who get more face time (different than FaceTime), who are spoken to regularly, who interact with live human beings, they are the ones who appear to start life with a couple more points on the scoreboard. This sort of positive interaction has been linked to parents with more education and higher socioeconomic status, but it’s believed upping the QT with your cutie is a way to overcome statistical disadvantages that may be outside of your control.
There has been less research into what effect parental media use has on children. Here's an article about a psychologist who in her observation (not scientific study), perceived that the kids of phone-engrossed parents in a fast food restaurant acted out. She references a father of 3 staring at his phone while his kids get crazy. What if lazy tech dad wasn’t causing his 3 children to act out by being preoccupied with his phone, but perhaps had been spending the entire day with those 3 rowdy kids and needed to check out for a minute and eat a burger (or maybe the kids were hungry for actual nutrients and poisoned by the toxic garbage served at the fast food place). This chicken/egg dilemma is a problem in most psych case studies because we’re pretty complex creatures. Anyway, to return to my point, there isn’t a lot of scientific evidence on this subject, but nonetheless plenty of common sense evidence suggests that ignoring your kids to look at your phone all day isn’t going to win you parent of the year. I get it.
You're welcome, child-intolerant plane passengers. |
I grew up mostly in the 90’s, though I won’t subject you to any lists of Saved by the Bell references to prove it. To me this was the era of the cordless phone, and a good part of my magical and enriching childhood was spent watching my mother pace around the house during 3 hour marathon phone calls. My mother-in-law recalls spending the whole of her summers immersed in conversation with other moms at the neighborhood pool while the kids played. Before that, Betty Draper types day-drank and chain-smoked while their kids ran around in the street. My point is parents have been ignoring their children for generations. It’s simply not possible to be animated and engaging 12-15 hours a day, not for me, not for you, not even for my charming, energetic children.
The family that selfies together... |
I’ve happily chosen to sacrifice most of my identity as an adult (my career, having a hair-do, wearing heels or anything silk, leaving the house past 7:00pm, etc.) for my children. Right now my connection to the world outside the walls of this love-filled home is my iPhone. I admit to letting my Apple worshipping ways seep into the lives of my kiddos but I think it’s logical to ask whether early technology use will be advantageous to the next generation in ways we don’t realize now. Being touch screen savvy might be more important in 20 years than we currently understand. Maybe these are the rambling justifications of an addict. What’s important to me now is having happy, healthy children and with a grateful heart I can say I do. If as a parent you can accomplish the same thing with less distraction, more power to you and please share your wisdom.
My parenting philosophy is rooted in the belief that my kids are people just like me, who deserve respect, and whose thoughts, feelings, words, behavior, concerns and accomplishments are worthy of my attention. I believe our actions leave a stronger impression than our words and try my best to be cognizant of what I’m role modeling. I’m pretty good at role modeling imperfection, and have come to incorporate the awareness and acceptance of this inevitability into my parenting. Through accepting that I can’t stimulate my child’s intellect 100% in each waking moment I’ve been able to permit myself some checked out time without diving into a whirlpool of mom guilt, which helps me to be more available physically and emotionally to my kids more often.
Life seems to consistently present me with the search for balance and the task of embracing moderation. Technology is certainly an area to which that applies. I want my family to have a masterful command of eye contact, but I’m tired of villainizing my lightweight, convenient connection to infant rash identification, weather reports and e-mail threads with my grandma. The precious years with our young children are far too short, but the days are loooonnng; long enough to look at Pinterest on a park bench while your kid swings.
This post inspired me to jot down my thoughts on the subject, and does a much better job defending smart phone moms than I do.
I am so glad that you started writing again. So glad.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for sharing. Very much enjoyed this - and wholeheartedly agree!
ReplyDelete"Not the same as FaceTime."
ReplyDeleteI love your writing and the new blog design.